TroyCampbell Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Originally Posted By: LiberTeenShe gave a passing glance backwards to Robert's pet wolf, happily and obliviously finishing the last of his meal, and without changing tempo or tone, finished, "Both of you, fuck me."What the hell? I joined this community for fun roleplaying, not dog sex! Do you just allow this shit to come and go as people please?This is unacceptable!Those of you who aren't speaking out about this.. well.. that says something about you. Its one thing if you just haven't noticed, but now there is no excuse.I am speaking of the Human Behaviors fiction in 2009. If you haven't read it, I suggest avoiding it.Unacceptable! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Nova Madigan Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 If a reference to bestiality in a work of fiction is the most shocking thing you have ever encountered on the internet, then you have been quite lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertyne Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Well, it says in Brittany's profile, which is both IC and OOC, that she's a pansexual extremist and sexual rights advocate. Bisexuality implies boys and girls; pansexuality covers everything else, though usually that just means transexuals, androgynes, etc., it can also mean, well, pretty much anything. I'm sorry if you have a problem with it, but again, it's only fiction, not necessarily representative of the views of the player, and nobody is forcing you or anyone to read the story. There's even a warning at the beginning. If that part of the story bothered you, you really should probably not read any more of LiberTeen's posts. It's going to get worse before it gets better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeleForce Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 I haven't read the story, so I don't know. Were the actual acts described? If so then I might say a line has been crossed, otherwise I can accept it.Rapido, Have you read any of Wakinyan's fictions? There are some pretty gross and/or graphic decriptions of acts/encounters in his works that go well beyond the implication of beastiality. The two that come rapidly to mind are the bifurcation of his penis via shapeshift so he could screw 2 people at once and Carver's near castration of him during an attempted abduction/rape.Always remember, things are labeled adult content for a reason. If you don't want to read about adult content, don't click the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David 'Dr. Troll' Smith Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Looking it over...Not only were acts of Beastiality not described, they weren't accomplished either. She made the suggestion, the guy wasn't willing to share, the dog/wolf wasn't interested. My first reading of this was she was not so much kidding as more interested in getting the guy hot than serious about banging the dog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravenshire Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 The very first thing you read at the start of the story is a warning. In the end, I would rather have my eyes burned out by truly disturbing ideas put into print than promote censorship of said ideas. I know the world can be a weird, torn-up place were bad things happen. I'm a father of two young children. I would still rather leave it up to the individual adult to decide what to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catalyst Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 The world is full of crazy batshits nut balls. We have people who do all sort of stupid shit...I think I would rather have those people be free to say what they want than have them say I can't say something I want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alessa Neri Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 As one of the posters, I gotta admit that I was surprised by the direction that post took, I talked it over with the player and we both agreed on leaving the subject untouched.The fic continued without that piece of plot, and the peace was uninterrupted.If it shook you up, what can I say? There was a huge warning on the title and the first post =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butterfly Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Oh, the idea is icky indeed...But characters like Cull also admitted to bestiality, and you were all warned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Percivald Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Okay, really, if you're worried about "the degeneration of morals" (and who titles a post like that), you're going to have a problem with... well, more than half of what is posted here. It gets much worse than a suggestion of bestiality. We're a community of more or less mature adults, all of which I think have firmly established morals (or lack of them), and with the capacity to stop reading something which is not of our taste, so we generally avoid censorship of any kind. Anyway, Aberrant is a pretty dark game, without even putting Taint into the picture, I'm not sure if you were looking for "nice" four-color roleplaying, but if you are you're going to have to watch what you read very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Brickman Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 ...you're going to have a problem with... well, more than half of what is posted here...Far less than that. The IC rooms are pretty clean. Even the fictions have less than a tenth I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alptraum Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Okay, so bestiality isn't your chosen spice, that's cool. Pretty normal too. But how about you pull back on the judgemental attitude, okay? If something bothers you then bring it up, the "shame-shame" tone isn't necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catalyst Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 We all know that bestiality will lead to the gay marriage... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velvet Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 The only thing "Unacceptable!" is your attitude, Troy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroyCampbell Posted March 9, 2007 Author Share Posted March 9, 2007 Okay. It has been brought to my attention my several of you (and I do thank you), that my tone was very accusatory (is that even a word?).If it was taken like that, i'm sorry. My heat got the most of me. I do not think less of anyone who is fine with that kind of thing, its just the entire idea really weirds me out. I went about making the topic wrong, and I really just wanted to start a conversation while being angry at the same time.Trolling is a term for it, I think? Flaming?My intentions were not to insult you.I don't like the idea of interspecies sexual transactions. I believe it just crosses a line into just wanting to get off.It isn't a romantic thing, and its not a thing for creation of life. I don't understand it.But than again, I am also against 'One night stands'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Brickman Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Originally Posted By: TroyLloydCampbellBut than again, I am also against 'One night stands'.So am I... which is extremely ironic considering the character I'm running here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velvet Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 It's your prerogative to dislike the idea of bestiality, sado-masochism, foot fetishism, pre-marital sex, the color green, or blueberry scones, and there's nothing wrong with discussing the subject. Just try to remember that we're all individuals, and your preferences are not always everyone else's. Personally, I don't care what people do in the privacy of their own homes as long as no one is irreparably harmed either mentally or physically by the proceedings. I don't believe that there's anything inherently wrong with recreational sex or variants thereof, provided that the preceding statement is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriel Stone Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 So... we keep Brittany away from pet shops. No big deal dude. Problem solved.BAD BRITTANY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stardust Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 With the things I've got up to in my short life I'd almost forgotten there were people with such a strong sense of morality. It's almost quaint. And okay, possibly not half of the stuff, and IC is pretty clean, but a pretty high percentage of fictions of '17, at least, have ended up containing excessive violence or some sort of sexual deviation, and we're the same players here than there (sans Wakinyan the ratio will improve slightly, I'm sure, but still). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertyne Posted March 10, 2007 Share Posted March 10, 2007 Originally Posted By: Gabriel LawSo... we keep Brittany away from pet shops. No big deal dude. Problem solved.BAD BRITTANY! But...but...Brittany likes the pet shop! In all seriousness, writing about something in a story doesn't mean advocating it. Our stories would be pretty boring if everyone was a good role model or a paragon of moral virtue. And that's not to say that Brittany isn't either or both of those things. After all, there are far more cruel and mean things that people routinely do than sex up their pets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyn Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Well, speaking from the perspective of the character I'm currently playing, I'm not in favor of serial killing or sexual abuse either, but the nature of the character I put together is that she does do those things and enjoy them. (Please note I'm not implying bestiality is similar to either of the above. /end disclaimer.) We write characters who do things we may or may not approve of because A) we think it makes for good drama or we're using them to make a metaphoric, literary or psychological point.If that offends you? Don't read it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Light Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 I thought everyone realized a long time ago that this thread was a big joke.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertyne Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 At least my threads are PEDO FREE, Lina!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Light Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 I think I actually had a discussion earlier in the chat about how its not Pedo. Hmm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert J. Lambert Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Ebophile, that's what Ravenshire turned out to be. It means to be sexually attracted to pre-pubscent (Tweens) and Teenagers under the age of 16.It's like Pedo-Light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Light Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Yeah, thats what it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.