Miss Baby Posted February 8, 2004 Share Posted February 8, 2004 Look at the footage,he was there.He is carried away by Utopia.Later that same day, a nova is checked into your clinic at Rio,the nova having abilities based off hard radeation.I have photos from said clinic.Backed up by testimonials from eye witnesses,home video tapes,sound recordings,paper trails... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Violette 'V' D'Aronique Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 WHAT footage? Nothing in N's archives. There are NO eyewitnesses because nobody survived ground zero. I checked all the T2M field reports and there's nada on finding a recent eruptee. Searched all the Rashoud entries for that week. Again, nothing.The only thing I've found on the general OpNet are constant references to a "dramatic recreation" done by Narcosis' film company. Given the choice between cover up and someone embelishing their story, I'm going with embellishment. We can play he said she said all night. I'm the one with access to PU records. You've just got his word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Paragon Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 Ms. D'Aronique is correct Ghetto Funk Baby. There were no eruptions from that sad event. That's my personal testimonial. A half dozen other novas showed up to help out as the heard about the blast, but there were no "new" eruptions that survived the event.Besides, Renegades eruption was almost two year later.Let me get this straight for you. 700 plus people dead, 30 blocks leveled, tens of thousands injured, and your guy has all this evidence, including our confidential records of people showing up for a eruption check-up.Yes, a person did check themselves in, but the occurance was that of a new power manifestation, not a new eruptee. I do thank you for bringing this to my attention, though. The leak has been located and steps are being taken to tighten our computer security accordingly. We view medical records confidentiality very seriously.Have a nice day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Craft Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 Just something to be considered:The electromagnetic pulse generated by the Sao Paolo detonation was more than sufficient to wipe out all forms of recording media in the area. There wasn't any footage of the event.And I believe that a combination of residual radiation, damage to infrastructure, and Utopia airspace control kept the media out for several days. So unless you are referring to classified Utopia records, there isn't any footage of the post-event, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Baby Posted February 9, 2004 Author Share Posted February 9, 2004 Alex,all those of magnetic storage.What,you don't use eufiber?The biggest EMP wouldn't do a thing to my computer.Paragon,you are good hiding your secrets...But,no one is prefect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashnod Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 I'm not getting involved here.Just want to point out that the OpNet was not fully online until 2005, that the intervening periods between that and 2002 when EuFiber cable technology was developed, much of the world was still dependant on non-EuFiber technology. The probability that San Paolo had full EuFiber networks in place and wasn't dependant in some fashion on what we now consider legacy technology is low.Secondly, EuFiber is not used as a storage medium to the best of my knowledge. It is used for optical cabling (and other networking equipment)for its high speed of data transfer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Baby Posted February 9, 2004 Author Share Posted February 9, 2004 Ashnod,I am sure you know that the fastest a prosses can go,is the based on the slowest part of said prosses.The slowest part of computers,and recording devises was the storage devices.So,if you up grade computers,and recording devices to something such eufiber,you are either wasting a whole lot of computing power,or fully up grading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashnod Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 Yes, I am aware of that. I'm also aware that EuFiber is not used as a storage material, only as a conduit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Craft Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 EuFiber can be used as a storage medium, but usually isn't. Doing so requires an expensive custom job, and is extremely rare even today. I'm not sure that it had ever been done at the time of Sao Paolo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Baby Posted February 9, 2004 Author Share Posted February 9, 2004 I'll trust my sources,and you all can believe Utopa never helps any nova. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doutor da Reducao Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 To a baseline, eufiber is best described simply as a quantum substitute for the mythical, room temperature superconductor. Are there other methods to accomplish similar performance? Não, as matérias menores são da importância pequena.There are means that could be conjectured for using it to store data, though even the theoretical work for such had not been done a decade ago. In a more mundane vein; the cost would have been beyond the realm of any but the most affluent. Senhora DeVries... Senhore Orzaiz... only such as they might possess the resources to obtain a curiosity as this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jager Posted February 16, 2004 Share Posted February 16, 2004 From August 7th 2001 until September 25th 2003...Yes, someone could have made a shielded system to record the events of San Paulo. It is theoretically possible.What I want to know is why.Why not sell it to one of the hundreds of news medias canvasing the scene afterwards?Why waste your time following the progress of one nova who took no part in the rescue efforts, or the clean-up?The biggest obstacle is that there are dozen's of reasons this would be a hoax, and only two (that come to me, anyway) for this to be real.I) This was done by a raving paranoid,and/orII) this was done by the individual behind the blast, who, for their own self-serving reasons, caused another person to erupt. They, not Utopia, then covered up the eruption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.