Can anyone enlighten me as to what this means? I mean, it's too early for Ab, and to late for A!, so what is it referring to? And in what book is this talked about? Given the intro to the timeline, the compiler didn't consider this a "minor" event. So what gives?
Weird unified timeline entry
#1
Posted 12 January 2010 - 02:45 PM
Can anyone enlighten me as to what this means? I mean, it's too early for Ab, and to late for A!, so what is it referring to? And in what book is this talked about? Given the intro to the timeline, the compiler didn't consider this a "minor" event. So what gives?
#2
Posted 12 January 2010 - 04:18 PM
Whatever it was, it got covered up by the Aeon Society *real* well, such that its easier to find evidence of weird phenomenon in the pulp era, than in the 70s.
#3
Posted 12 January 2010 - 07:35 PM
#4
Posted 12 January 2010 - 10:46 PM
Who's the black private dick
That's a sex machine to all the chicks?
SHAFT!
Ya damn right!
6 (meeelion!) dollar man? Sounds like a Stalwart to me!
#5
Posted 12 January 2010 - 10:54 PM
( we will not speak of the aeon d20 material; better to have died with dignity than suffered *that* indignity )
#7
Posted 13 January 2010 - 03:49 AM
D20 would just require a M&M level overhaul to work for Aberrant, and notable work to apply to Adventure and Trinity. Instead, it got practically the opposite.
#8
Posted 14 January 2010 - 02:37 AM
Looking at the timeline entry on p. 82 of the Trinity core book, I can posit 2 (in-game) possibilities for it. The first is the increased effectiveness of the media, as stated in my previous post. The second possibility would be that said increase in super-normal events was a direct result of Michael Donighal's first attempt at recreating the Hammersmith Event.
Going by what's been speculated here & elsewhere about this, it's not beyond the realm of plausibility that Donighal could have attained Quantum 6 or 7 by then. So in the best experimental fashion, he does his best to create a Telluric vortex in the early 1970s, and the results are considerably less than he'd hoped to achieve (if we can consider the events of the first N-Day to be Donighal's goal). I could be wrong about this, but the Inspired outrageousness might even have been confined to the North American continent.
Your thoughts, anyone?
#10
Posted 14 January 2010 - 05:12 PM
#12
Posted 14 January 2010 - 11:49 PM
Again, where does that tidbit come from? Was there a discussion of the Aeon Continuum gameline's "bible" that this was snipped out of, or is it just more speculation?
#15
Posted 15 January 2010 - 02:54 AM
Of course, this doesn't work out well, due to Mercer actually being a pretty awful person underneath, and having one's best friend reveal himself to be an epic hypocrite who condones genocide is the kind of thing to sour one on the human race in general. . .
#17
Posted 16 January 2010 - 12:09 AM
Of course, this doesn't work out well, due to Mercer actually being a pretty awful person underneath, and having one's best friend reveal himself to be an epic hypocrite who condones genocide is the kind of thing to sour one on the human race in general. . .
#18
Posted 16 January 2010 - 03:21 AM
Enough to drive one into becomming a taint-maddened megalomaniac. Hmmm...Taint-Maddened...
Seriosuly though, I don;t know where I read it...could have been one of the developer's made a comment at some point.
#19
Posted 16 January 2010 - 05:23 AM
#20
Posted 24 April 2010 - 02:31 PM
December 9, 1964 Railroad Crossing Disaster Narrowly Averted. Is a sample newpaper clipping cleansed from the public record by Project Proteus (inferred by Aeon originally).
March 18, 1981 "Radiation sickness", that Aeon intercedes to remove a tainted erruption from a physician's care.
A:PU, p99 - "Different issues of newspapers and news circulars all over the country (not to mention some international ones) have been selectively removed from archives and databases as far back as the 30s and 40s."
So that is a cannon reference covering 1930-1981 cover up by Aeon of Aberrants.
#21
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:01 PM
Are these decades old abbies the reason behind the few seriously powerful ones? Divis, Pax, Sophia, Scripture, etc?
Antaeus and Gaby we think we have origins for... but honestly I'd rather post date them too.
Further, does this mean that there are *other* power-houses out there?
I think the setting was started with that idea, but it was never pursued beyond Divis.
#22
Posted 25 April 2010 - 01:39 AM
Are these decades old abbies the reason behind the few seriously powerful ones? Divis, Pax, Sophia, Scripture, etc?
Antaeus and Gaby we think we have origins for... but honestly I'd rather post date them too.
Further, does this mean that there are *other* power-houses out there?
I think the setting was started with that idea, but it was never pursued beyond Divis.
As for the two cases mentioned by Gideon, I like to think that Aeon never got their hooks into the speedster from 1964. AFA the unfortunate from 1981, I suspect he or she may have been euthanized.
#23
Posted 25 April 2010 - 02:40 AM
#24
Posted 25 April 2010 - 04:18 AM
I've done this kind of thing IC myself... you have a closet nova who "erupts" in a staged situation. The "onlookers" are clueless bystanders selected at random because they're clueless bystanders. It works best if you have Dorm or some flavor of shapeshifting... but you could just steal someone else's identity and claim you used to look different.
#25
Posted 26 April 2010 - 02:41 AM
Living through that sort of stuff (and remaining free/covert!) does NOT give one a sudden desire to register himself with Appellate Lexington (the codename trademark company).
#27
Posted 26 April 2010 - 06:16 AM
Agreed that the Proteus deathsquads would've kicked the threat up a notch or several, though.
#29
Posted 26 April 2010 - 05:10 PM
Assume that Aeon *did* find "whoever" did it. Decades later, he'd probably look a lot like Pax. ;)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Top










